Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
3.
AAPS J ; 23(6): 112, 2021 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1470633

ABSTRACT

Recent changes in the pharmaceutical industry have led to significant paradigm shifts in the pharmaceutical quality environment. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, increasingly rapid development of novel therapies, and adoption of new manufacturing techniques have presented numerous challenges for the established regulatory framework and quality environment and are impacting the approaches utilized to ensure the quality of pharmaceutical products. Regulators, industry, and standards-setting organizations have begun to recognize the need to rely more on integrated risk-based approaches and to create more nimble and flexible standards to complement these efforts. They also increasingly have recognized that quality needs to be built into systems and processes throughout the lifecycle of the product. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 crisis has emphasized the need to adopt practices that better promote global supply chain resilience. In this paper, the USP Quality Advisory Group explores the various paradigm shifts currently impacting pharmaceutical quality and the approaches that are being taken to adapt to this new environment. Broad adoption of the Analytical Procedure Lifecycle approach, improved data management, and utilization of digital technologies are identified as potential solutions that can help meet the challenges of these quality paradigm shifts. Further discussion and collaboration among stakeholders are needed to pursue these and other solutions that can ensure a continued focus on quality while facilitating pharmaceutical innovation and development.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Drug Industry/standards , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Pharmacopoeias as Topic/standards , Quality Control , COVID-19/prevention & control , Drug Industry/methods , Humans , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards , United States/epidemiology
6.
Pharmaceut Med ; 35(4): 197-202, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1293483

ABSTRACT

The medical affairs function represents one of the scientific interfaces in a pharmaceutical organization. Over the last two decades, medical affairs has evolved from being a support function to a strategic pillar within organizational business units. The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to unforeseen circumstances resulting in a dramatic change in external stakeholder engagements, catapulting the medical affairs function into leading the way on scientific engagements and patient-centric endeavors. The changes in stakeholder interactions and behavior as a result of the pandemic last year are likely to persist in the foreseeable future for which medical affairs professionals need to enhance existing skill sets and acquire expertise in newer domains. In this paper, the transformation of the medical affairs team to a key strategic partner and the skills required to strengthen this transition, in the next normal of a post-COVID world, is explored.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Drug Development/trends , Drug Industry/trends , Stakeholder Participation , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Drug Development/organization & administration , Drug Development/standards , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Drug Industry/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , India , Pandemics/prevention & control
7.
Drug Saf ; 44(1): 95-105, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1092875

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based clinical data on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pharmacotherapies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study documented and characterized COVID-19 cases reported in individuals receiving treatment with Pfizer pharmaceutical products and cases that reported use of Pfizer pharmaceutical products for COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: This retrospective observational review leveraged the Pfizer safety database containing adverse event data collected in association with use of Pfizer products between 1 October, 2019, and 25 June, 2020; the database includes worldwide adverse event data from various sources. Selected Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Preferred Terms and subsequent clinical review were used to characterize COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: Over 1500 relevant cases were identified over an 8-month period. In cases that reported COVID-19, immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents, followed by anticoagulant/antithrombic agents and corticosteroids, were the most frequently reported agents. The frequent reporting of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents among cases of COVID-19 suggests increased vulnerability to infection among treated patients, either because of immunosuppressive effects of certain agents or the nature of the underlying treated condition. In cases involving off-label pharmacotherapy use for the treatment of COVID-19-related conditions, the most frequently reported therapeutic classes included antibiotics, antimalarial agents, antivirals/antiretroviral agents, immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents, corticosteroids, anticoagulants, and immunoglobulin/interferons. The most frequently reported pharmacotherapeutic agents were azithromycin and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, followed by lopinavir-ritonavir, ceftriaxone, and tofacitinib. The most frequently reported clinical adverse events associated with azithromycin (as sole therapy or combined with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine) include electrocardiogram QT prolonged, drug interaction, hepatitis, diarrhea, and hepatitis acute. Regarding cardiac-related events, 19% (120/645) of azithromycin cases reported events associated with QT prolongation/torsade de pointes (which included seven fatal cardiac events). The most frequently reported clinical adverse events associated with other commonly used agents are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacovigilance surveillance study provides a unique characterization of cases in which a broad range of pharmaceutical products was reported in relation to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , Drug Industry/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Global Health/trends , Pharmacovigilance , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/standards , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual/standards , Databases, Factual/trends , Drug Industry/standards , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Global Health/standards , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 545: 145-149, 2021 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1061767

ABSTRACT

In March 2013 it was reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) the first cases of human infections with avian influenza virus A (H7N9). From 2013 to December 2019, 1568 cases have been reported with 616 deaths. H7N9 infection has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, and vaccination is currently the most effective way to prevent infections and consequently flu-related severe illness. Developing and producing vaccines against pandemic influenza viruses is the main strategy for a response to a possible pandemic. This study aims to present the production of three industrial lots under current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) of the active antigen used to produce the pandemic influenza vaccine candidate against A(H7N9). These batches were characterized and evaluated for quality standards and tested for immunogenicity in mice. The average yield was 173.50 ± 7.88 µg/mL of hemagglutinin and all the preparations met all the required specifications. The formulated H7N9 vaccine is poorly immunogenic and needs to be adjuvanted with an oil in water emulsion adjuvant (IB160) to achieve a best immune response, in a prime and in a boost scheme. These data are important for initial production planning and preparedness in the case of a H7N9 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/biosynthesis , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Animals , Antigens, Viral/biosynthesis , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Drug Compounding/methods , Drug Compounding/statistics & numerical data , Drug Industry/standards , Female , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/virology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Vaccines, Inactivated/biosynthesis , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/isolation & purification
9.
Vaccine ; 38(52): 8318-8325, 2020 12 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-922155

ABSTRACT

The counterfeiting of vaccines is an increasing problem globally with the safety of persons vaccinated, the trust in vaccines generally and the associated reputation of vaccine manufacturers and regulatory agencies at risk. This risk is especially critical with the on-going development of COVID-19 vaccines. The ability to track and trace vaccines through the vaccine supply chain down to persons vaccinated has to be enhanced. In this context of traceability, the global immunization community has recently set the barcoding of the primary packaging of vaccines, specifically vaccine vials and pre-filled syringes, as a top priority. Emerging vaccine manufacturers are already engaged in investigating ways to incorporate barcoding in their labelling and packaging using GS1 international standards. A specific pilot taking place in Indonesia by the national vaccine manufacturer, Bio Farma, shows the innovation of barcoding on primary packaging already underway with a relatively modest level of investment and success at this stage. This article highlights the efforts of industry and governments on the value of traceability and introduction to 2D barcodes. Access to financial resources and support from the international immunization community would accelerate such innovations leading to enhanced security of the vaccine supply chain.


Subject(s)
Counterfeit Drugs , Drug Industry/standards , Drug Labeling/standards , Electronic Data Processing , Vaccines/standards , COVID-19 Vaccines/standards , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/methods , Drug Labeling/methods , Humans , Indonesia , International Cooperation , Inventions , Investments , Organizational Innovation , Pilot Projects
11.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol ; 74(4): 468-494, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-437033

ABSTRACT

This article reviews currently available scientific literature related to the epidemiology, infectivity, survival, and susceptibility to disinfectants of Coronaviruses, in the context of the controls established to meet good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations and guidance, and the public health guidance issued specifically to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the pharmaceutical supply chain is assessed and recommendations are listed for risk mitigation steps to minimize supply disruption to pharmaceutical drug products. Areas addressed include a brief history of the COVID-19 viral pandemic, a description of the virus, the regulatory response to the pandemic, the screening of employees, the persistence of the virus on inanimate surfaces, cleaning and disinfection of manufacturing facilities, the use of GMP-mandated personal protective equipment to counter the spread of the disease, the role of air changes in viral clearance, and approaches to risk assessment and mitigation. Biological medicinal products have a great record of safety, yet the cell cultures used for production can be susceptible to viruses, and contamination events have occurred. Studies on SARS-CoV-2 for it ability to replicate in various mammalian cell lines used for biopharmaceutical manufacturing suggests that the virus poses a low risk and any contamination would be detected by currently used adventitious virus testing. The consequences of the potential virus exposure of manufacturing processes as well as the effectiveness of mitigation efforts are discussed. The pharmaceutical supply chain is complex, traversing many geographies and companies that range from large multinationals to mid- and small-size operations. This paper recommends practices that can be adopted by all companies, irrespective of their size, geographic location, or position in the supply chain.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Animals , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disinfectants/chemistry , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Drug Industry/standards , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Risk Management/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL